Post-Truth Politics and the Competition of Ideas
نویسندگان
چکیده
“Post-truth” politics is often framed as a failure of the competition ideas. Yet there are different ways thinking about ideas, with implications for way we understand its benefits and risks. The dominant framing ideas in terms marketplace, which, however, obscures can compete. Several theorists help us think through ideas. J. S. Mill, example, avoided metaphor market by focusing, instead, on testing arguments adversarial encounters before critical audience. Georg Simmel, alternatively, conceived form indirect conflict, where two individuals strive parallel to gain audience approval. This view emphasizes innovation creativity “all all.” More recently, have developed logic marketplace not but rationalizations. articulates some features Simmel’s competition, underestimates degrees constraint required secure goods competition. Ultimately, recognizing these modes public sphere enrich our theories deliberative democracy sharpen problem “post-truth” politics.
منابع مشابه
romantic education:reading william wordsworths the prelude in the light of the history of ideas
عصر روشنگری زمان شکل گیری ایده های مدرن تربیتی- آموزشی بود اما تاکید بیش از اندازه ی دوشاخه مهم فلسفی زمان یعنی عقل گرایی و حس گرایی بر دقت و وضوح، انسان عصر روشنگری را نسبت به دیگر تواناییهایش نابینا کرده و موجب به وجود آمدن افرادی تک بعدی شد که افتخارعقلانیتشان، تاکید شان بر تجربه فردی، به مبارزه طلبیدن منطق نیاکانشان وافسون زدایی شان از دنیا وتمام آنچه با حواس پنجگانه قابل درک نبوده و یا در ...
a comparative move analysis of the introduction sections of ma theses by iranian and native post-graduate students
since esp received universal attention to smooth the path for academic studies and productions, a great deal of research and studies have been directed towards this area. swales’ (1990) model of ra introduction move analysis has served a pioneering role of guiding many relevant studies and has proven to be productive in terms of helpful guidelines that are the outcome of voluminous productions ...
15 صفحه اول“Enemies of the People?” Public Health in the Era of Populist Politics; Comment on “The Rise of Post-truth Populism in Pluralist Liberal Democracies: Challenges for Health Policy”
In this commentary, we review the growth of populist politics, associated with exploitation of what has been termed fake news. We explore how certain words have been used in similar contexts historically, in particular the term “enemy of the people,” especially with regard to public health. We then set out 6 principles for public health professionals faced with these situations. First, using th...
متن کاملGlobal Health Politics: Neither Solidarity nor Policy; Comment on “Globalization and the Diffusion of Ideas: Why We Should Acknowledge the Roots of Mainstream Ideas in Global Health”
The global health agenda has been dominating the current global health policy debate. Furthermore, it has compelled countries to embrace strategies for tackling health inequalities in a wide range of public health areas. The article by Robert and colleagues highlights that although globalization has increased opportunities to share and spread ideas, there is still great asymmetry of power accor...
متن کاملsurvey on the rule of the due & hindering relying on the sheikh ansaris ideas
قاعده مقتضی و مانع در متون فقهی کم و بیش مستند احکام قرار گرفته و مورد مناقشه فقهاء و اصولیین می باشد و مشهور معتقند مقتضی و مانع، قاعده نیست بلکه یکی از مسائل ذیل استصحاب است لذا نگارنده بر آن شد تا پیرامون این قاعده پژوهش جامعی انجام دهد. به عقیده ما مقتضی دارای حیثیت مستقلی است و هر گاه می گوییم مقتضی احراز شد یعنی با ماهیت مستقل خودش محرز گشته و قطعا اقتضاء خود را خواهد داشت مانند نکاح که ...
15 صفحه اولذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Critical Review
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['0891-3811', '1933-8007']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2023.2221504